Diplomacy vs. Survivor
The CBS "reality" show Survivor has been pulling in extraordinary ratings -- but, really, isn't Survivor just a large-scale negotiation game?
I would argue that it is, though some of the Survivor players don't seem much interested in negotiating. (Not coincidentally, I'd bet that those players will appear on the CBS Morning Show well before the show comes to an end.) And what better negotiating game could there possibly be than the venerable Diplomacy?
|
| In Diplomacy, your goal is to outwit, outplay and outlast your opponents to control a majority of supply centers in Europe. In Survivor, your goal is is to outwit, outplay and outlast your opponents to be the last one on the island. Graphic from Broderbund's ClickArt collection. |
Other similarities between the two games:
- Players spend a great deal of time negotiating alliances.
- Careful planning is required, with both short-term tactics and long-term strategy playing a major role in determining the eventual winner.
- In Diplomacy, you're always trying to control additional supply centers -- similar to the reward challenges in Survivor, in which supplies are the prizes.
- Your overall success depends in large part on the actions of other players.
Once you've read through both lists, post a note in the Forum and let us know -- which do you think is better?
| NAVIGATE THIS BOARDGAMES ARTICLE | |
| Page 1 | Why Diplomacy and Survivor are actually quite similar. |
| Page 2 | Five reasons why Diplomacy is better than Survivor. |
| Page 3 | Five reasons why Survivor is better than Diplomacy. |
Article Archive
An ever-growing library of boardgame features.
Boardgame News
The latest in the world of board games and other table games.

